Public LLMs: Fast, Scalable, Accessible

Public AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini offer rapid deployment, high capability, and low barrier to entry. They are ideal for general productivity, content generation, and non-sensitive workloads. However, public LLMs introduce challenges: limited control over data processing, potential data retention and reuse, and reduced visibility and auditability.

Private LLMs: Controlled, Secure, Customised

Private LLMs hosted in controlled environments offer full control over data, enhanced security and privacy, integration with internal systems, and customisation for business use. The trade-offs are higher cost, operational complexity, and maintenance overhead. Private models are the right choice when data sensitivity, regulatory obligations, or business criticality require it.

Governance Is the Deciding Factor

The real decision is not public versus private. It is what level of control is required for the data and use case. Factors include data classification and sensitivity, regulatory obligations, business criticality, user base and access requirements, and cost versus control trade-offs.

The Hybrid Model: Best Practice

Most organisations will adopt a hybrid approach. Public AI for low-risk, general tasks and non-sensitive workloads. Private LLM for sensitive data, critical workflows, regulated data, and proprietary business processes. The key is having a clear policy that defines which model tier applies to which data and use case.

Data classification before any AI usage
Identity and access control for AI services
Monitoring and logging of all AI interactions
Clear AI acceptable use policies
Data residency and sovereignty requirements
Vendor security assessment before procurement
The organisations that succeed will not be the fastest adopters. They will be the ones that adopt AI with governance at the core.
Public vs Private LLM — Security and Governance Considerations Data residency · IP protection · Compliance · Cost · Control — decision framework for enterprise AI deployment PUBLIC LLM (ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude.ai) PRIVATE LLM (Azure OpenAI / AWS Bedrock) Data Residency Data leaves your environment · Processed on vendor infrastructure · Jurisdiction unknown Data Residency Data stays in your tenant · EU/UK data residency enforced · Full sovereignty IP and Confidential Data Prompts may train future models · Source code / strategy leaked · No guarantee of deletion IP and Confidential Data Prompts not used for training · Contractual data processing agreement · Auditable Compliance (GDPR / DORA) Article 28 processor obligations unclear · Data transfer risk · ICO exposure Compliance (GDPR / DORA) DPA in place · SCCs · EU AI Act ready · DORA operational resilience covered Access Control Consumer auth only · No SSO · No RBAC · No session logging to SIEM Access Control Entra ID SSO · RBAC · Conditional access · Full session audit log to SIEM Cost Model Low upfront · Per token · Hidden cost at scale · No budget predictability Cost Model Reserved capacity · Predictable Azure/AWS billing · Volume discounts · FinOps governed When Appropriate Non-sensitive tasks · Public content · Prototyping · Individual productivity tools When Required Any business data · Customer PII · Financial data · IP · Regulated industries Decision Rule: If the prompt contains anything you would not email to a competitor, use private LLM only Azure OpenAI Service · AWS Bedrock · Google Vertex AI (private) · On-premises models (Llama / Mistral) all provide enterprise data protection
// Public vs private LLM security and governance considerations
Back to all articlesSOCs Are Evolving